J. Al Suwaidi et al., Immediate and one-year outcome of intracoronary stent implantation in small coronary arteries with 2.5-mm stents, AM HEART J, 140(6), 2000, pp. 898-905
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Background The role of coronary stenting in the treatment of stenoses in sm
all coronary arteries with use of 2.5-mm stents is not well defined.
Methods and Results Between January 1995 and August 1999, 651 patients with
stenoses in small coronary arteries were treated with 2.5-mm stents (n = 1
08) or 2.5-mm conventional balloon angioplasty (BA) (n = 543). Patients who
received treatment with both 2.5-mm and greater than or equal to3.0-mm ste
nt placement or balloons were excluded. Procedural success and complication
rates as well as 1-year follow-up outcomes were examined. Baseline clinica
l characteristics were similar between the two groups, except patients in t
he stent group were more likely to have hypertension and a family history o
f coronary artery disease and less likely to have prior myocardial infarcti
on. Angiographic success rates were higher in the stent group (97.2% vs 90.
2%, P =.02). In-hospital complication rates were comparable between the two
groups. Among successfully treated patients, 1-year follow-up revealed no
significant differences in the survival (96.2% vs 95.2%, P =.89) or the fre
quency of Q-wave myocardial infarction (0% vs 0.4%, P =.60) or coronary art
ery bypass grafting (8.4% vs 6.8%, P =.89) between the stent and BA groups,
respectively. However, patients in the stent group were more likely to hav
e adverse cardiac events (35.4% vs 22. 1%, P =.05). Stent use after excludi
ng GR II stent use, however, was not independently associated with reduced
cardiac events at follow-vp (relative risk 1.3 [95% confidence interval 0.8
-2.3], P =.30).
Conclusions Intracoronary stent implantation of stenoses in small coronary
arteries with 2.5-mm stents can be carried out with high success and accept
able complication rates. However, compared with BA alone, stent use was not
associated with improved outcome through 1 year of follow-up.