One of the greatest remaining challenges facing nephrology research is obta
ining data with detail and precision for the three large, yet "forgotten,"
populations that span the spectrum of kidney disease: patients with chronic
renal insufficiency (CRI), peritoneal dialysis patients, and kidney transp
lant patients. Studies of these populations, particularly the CRI group, ar
e hampered by the relative mobility of these patients, the lack of stringen
t epidemiologic or clinical definitions, and the tendency to extrapolate da
ta from hemodialysis populations into other clinical settings. This article
suggests a two-pronged approach to a research agenda: first, by recognizin
g the need for better data regarding the natural history of these kidney fa
ilure subsets and their comorbidities; and second, by directing greater eff
ort at identifying rational, efficacious, and cost-effective interventions
to influence their natural history positively. Specific efforts are suggest
ed In all three populations. For patients with CRI, studies should be direc
ted at (1) identifying high-risk patients; (2) determining methods for maki
ng optimal referrals to the nephrologist; (3) identifying and managing CRI,
its complications, and its comorbid conditions; and (4) establishing proce
sses for the smooth transition to dialysis. The peritoneal dialysis populat
ion will benefit from studies addressing the treatment of anemia and its ab
ility to modify cardiovascular illness and quality of life. Kidney transpla
nt studies should also focus on the identification and management of comorb
id conditions, as well as the effects of various interventions on quality o
f life. Rational evidence-based care of these conditions, which are critica
lly important to patients, their families, and the health care system in ge
neral, must await the conduct of well designed prospective observational an
d interventional trials. (C) 2000 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.