The effect of majority-minority mandates on partisan gerrymandering

Authors
Citation
Kw. Shotts, The effect of majority-minority mandates on partisan gerrymandering, AM J POL SC, 45(1), 2001, pp. 120-135
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Politucal Science & public Administration
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE
ISSN journal
00925853 → ACNP
Volume
45
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
120 - 135
Database
ISI
SICI code
0092-5853(200101)45:1<120:TEOMMO>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
I develop a model of optimal partisan gerrymandering to analyze the claim t hat majority-minority legislative districting helps Republicans. I first de termine the number of Democrats elected in states where Democrats control d istricting and the number Republicans elected in states where Republicans c ontrol redistricting determine how electoral outcomes change if the federal government requires redistricters to create majority-minority districts. I n where Republicans control redistricting, majority-minority mandates weakl y decrease the number of Republicans elected. In states where Democrats con trol redistricting, a majority-minority mandate does number of Democrats Ho wever, if Democratic redistricters face geographical constraints or superma jority-minority mandates, some Democratic votes are wasted and the number o f Democrats elected weakly decreases.