The positive predictive value of cervical smears in previously screened postmenopausal women: The Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS)
Gf. Sawaya et al., The positive predictive value of cervical smears in previously screened postmenopausal women: The Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS), ANN INT MED, 133(12), 2000, pp. 942-950
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Background: The benefits and risks of performing annual cervical smears on
postmenopausal women are not well defined. The independent effect of hormon
e replacement therapy on development of cytologic abnormalities is unknown.
Objective: To determine the positive predictive value of cervical smears in
previously screened postmenopausal women and to determine the effect of or
al estrogen plus progestin on incident cervical cytologic abnormalities.
Design: Prospective cohort study (incidence) and randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled trial (hormone therapy).
Setting: 20 U.S. outpatient and community clinical centers.
Participants: 2561 women with a uterus and normal cytologic characteristics
at baseline.
Interventions: Annual smears; oral conjugated equine estrogens, 0.625 mg/d,
plus medroxyprogesterone acetate, 2.5 mg/d, or identical placebo.
Measurements: Incident cytologic abnormalities (atypical squamous cells of
undetermined significance, atypical glandular cells of undetermined signifi
cance, low-grade squamous epithelial lesion, and high-grade squamous epithe
lial lesion) and final histologic diagnoses.
Results: The incidence of new cytologic abnormalities in the 2 years follow
ing a normal smear was 110 per 4895 person-years (23 per 1000 person-years
[95% CI, 18 to 27 per 1000 person-years]). Among the 103 women with known h
istologic diagnoses, one had mild to moderate dysplasia. The positive predi
ctive value of any smear abnormality identified 1 year after a normal smear
, therefore, was 0% (CI, 0% to 5.0%) (0 of 78 women); the positive predicti
ve value of abnormalities found within 2 years was 0.9% (CI, 0.0% to 3.0%)
(1 of 110 women). In hormone-treated compared with non-hormone-treated wome
n, the incidence of cytologic abnormalities was nonsignificantly higher (re
lative hazard, 1.36 [CI, 0.93 to 1.99]), largely because of a nonsignifican
t 58% greater incidence of atypical squamous cells of undetermined signific
ance (relative hazard, 1.58 [CI, 0.99 to 2.52]).
Conclusions: Because of a poor positive predictive value, cervical smears s
hould not be performed within 2 years of normal cytologic results in postme
nopausal women. Therapy with oral estrogen plus progestin does not signific
antly affect the incidence of cytologic abnormalities.