S. Amin et al., Association of hypogonadism and estradiol levels with bone mineral densityin elderly men from the framingham study, ANN INT MED, 133(12), 2000, pp. 951-963
Citations number
65
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Background: Both hypogonadism and low estrogen levels adversely affect bone
health in young men. In elderly men, who are at greatest risk for osteopor
otic fracture, the influence of hypogonadism on bone mineral density remain
s unclear, as does the relative effect of estrogen status compared to hypog
onadism.
Objective: To examine the relation of hypogonadism and estrogen status to b
one mineral density in elderly men.
Design: Community-based, prospective cohort study.
Setting: Framingham, Massachusetts.
Patients: Male participants of the Framingham Study.
Measurements: Total testosterone, total estradiol, and luteinizing hormone
were measured in participants at all four biennial examinations from 1981 t
o 1989. Values from at least three of four examinations were averaged. Hypo
gonadism was defined as a mean testosterone level less than 10.4 nmol/L (<3
.0 ng/mL) or a mean luteinizing hormone level of 20 IU/L or greater. An alt
ernate definition of hypogonadism based only on a mean testosterone level l
ess than 10.4 nmol/L (<3.0 ng/mL) was also used. In 1988-1989, bone mineral
density was measured at the proximal femur (femoral neck, Ward triangle, a
nd trochanter) and lumbar spine by using dual-photon absorptiometry and at
the radial shaft by using single-photon absorptiometry. The association of
hypogonadism with bone mineral density was examined with adjustment for con
founders, including estradiol levels. A similar model that adjusted for hyp
ogonadism was used to examine the association of estradiol level (ranked as
quartiles) with bone mineral density.
Results: of 448 men with bone mineral density measurements, 405 had evaluab
le hormone levels (mean age, 75.7 years [range, 68 to 96 years]); 71 (17.5%
) of the 405 men were hypogonadal. Bone mineral density at any site did not
significantly differ in hypogonadal men compared with eugonadal men (for e
xample, bone mineral density at the femoral neck was 0.89 g/cm(2) vs. 0.87
g/cm(2), respectively; P > 0.2), even when alternate definitions of hypogon
adism were used. In contrast, compared with the lowest estradiol quartile,
men with higher estradiol levels had greater mean bone mineral density at a
ll sites (for example, bone mineral density at the femoral neck was 0.84 g/
cm(2), 0.88 g/cm(2), 0.86 g/cm(2), and 0.91 g/cm(2) from the lowest to the
highest estradiol quartile; P for trend = 0.002). The difference in mean bo
ne mineral density between men in the lowest and those in the highest estra
diol quartile levels was similar to the effect of 10 years of aging on bone
mineral density.
Conclusions: In elderly men, hypogonadism related to aging has little influ
ence on bone mineral density, but serum estradiol levels have a strong and
positive association with bone mineral density.