Ernest Gellner's theory of nationalism is founded on a simplistic and decep
tive materialistic reasoning, masking the tension between functionalist pos
tulates and historicist inclinations. Various methods are used to resolve t
his tension. Initially, idealism is introduced into the body of the analysi
s. When this becomes too visible, the nature of the materialism displayed i
s discretely modified. Relational materialism - a dynamic articulation betw
een relations to the means of production and relations between classes - gi
ves way to substantialist materialism - based on a mechanical opposition be
tween the means of production and ethno-linguistic attributes. The use of a
consistent vocabulary obscures the elision between the two: 'structure' an
d 'culture' are alternatively defined in relational or in substantialist te
rms. Gellner then returns to relational considerations which make his expla
nation all the more unclear.