Is it necessary to administer anti-D to prevent RhD immunization after thetransfusion of RhD-positive platelet concentrates?

Citation
W. Atoyebi et al., Is it necessary to administer anti-D to prevent RhD immunization after thetransfusion of RhD-positive platelet concentrates?, BR J HAEM, 111(3), 2000, pp. 980-983
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Hematology,"Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
ISSN journal
00071048 → ACNP
Volume
111
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
980 - 983
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-1048(200012)111:3<980:IINTAA>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Serology for the presence of anti-D after RhD-incompatible platelet transfu sions was performed in 24 RhD-negative patients with haematological disease and 59 RhD-negative patients with non-haematological disease. None of the patients were given prophylaxis with anti-D to prevent RhD immunization. Ei ght out of 59 (13.5%) non-haematology patients developed detectable anti-D, whereas 0 out of 24 (0%) of the haematology patients formed anti-D (P = 0. 06). The risk of alloimmunization after RhD-incompatible platelet transfusi ons using platelet concentrates prepared by modern technical methods appear s to be small in patients with haematological disease, but is significant i n non-immunocompromised patients.