Birth trauma: short and long term effects of forceps delivery compared with spontaneous delivery on various pelvic floor parameters

Citation
S. Meyer et al., Birth trauma: short and long term effects of forceps delivery compared with spontaneous delivery on various pelvic floor parameters, BR J OBST G, 107(11), 2000, pp. 1360-1365
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY
ISSN journal
14700328 → ACNP
Volume
107
Issue
11
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1360 - 1365
Database
ISI
SICI code
1470-0328(200011)107:11<1360:BTSALT>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
Objective To compare the effects of forceps delivery and spontaneous delive ry on pelvic floor functions in nulliparous women. A longitudinal prospecti ve study with investigations during the first pregnancy, 10 weeks and 10 Design A longitudinal pl months after delivery. Setting Antenatal clinic in a teaching hospital. Population One hundred and seven patients aged 28+/-4 years, divided into t hose with forceps (n = 25) or spontaneous (n = 82) delivery. Methods Investigations with a questionnaire, clinical examination, assessme nt of bladder neck behaviour, urethral sphincter function, intra-vaginal/in tra-anal pressures during pelvic floor contractions. Results The incidence of stress urinary incontinence was similar in both gr oups at 9 weeks (32% vs 21%, P = 0.3) and 10 months (20% vs 15%, P = 0.6) a fter delivery, as was the incidence of faecal incontinence (9 weeks: 8% vs 4%, P = 0.9; 10 months: 4% vs 5%, P = 1) and the decreased sexual response at 10 months (12% vs 18%, P = 0.6). Bladder neck behaviour, urethral sphinc ter function and intra-vaginal and intra-anal pressures were also similar i n the two groups. However, 10 months after delivery, the incidence of a wea k pelvic floor (20% vs 6%, P = 0.05) and the decrease in intra-anal pressur e between the pre- and post-delivery values (-17+/-28 cm H2O vs 3+/-31 cm H 2O, P = 0.04) were significantly greater in the forceps-delivered women. Conclusions Forceps delivery is not responsible for a higher incidence of p elvic floor complaints or greater changes in bladder neck behaviour or uret hral sphincter functions. However, patients with forceps delivery have a si gnificantly greater decrease in intra-anal pressure and a greater incidence of a weak pelvic floor.