Differences in ventricular septal motion between subgroups of patients with heart failure

Citation
Sg. Horne et al., Differences in ventricular septal motion between subgroups of patients with heart failure, CAN J CARD, 16(11), 2000, pp. 1377-1384
Citations number
53
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
ISSN journal
0828282X → ACNP
Volume
16
Issue
11
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1377 - 1384
Database
ISI
SICI code
0828-282X(200011)16:11<1377:DIVSMB>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Septal systolic motion is determined by the end-diastolic trans -septal pressure gradient, and hence is load dependent. OBJECTIVE: To explore septal contribution to left ventricular (LV) systolic function in patients with heart failure. DESIGN: Echocardiograms were identified post hoc from normal subjects and a cohort of patients with heart failure. PATIENTS: Twelve normal subjects and 69 patients with heart failure and nor mal conduction or left bundle branch block (LBBB) were studied. METHODS: Parasternal short axis LV end-diastolic and end systolic areas wer e traced. Using a floating centroid, 32 radial chords were constructed, and percentage shortening from end diastole to end systole was calculated for each chord. MAIN RESULTS: Comparing heart. failure with normal conduction and LBBB, LV end-diastolic area was similar (43 +/- 10 versus 45 +/- 12 cm(2), not signi ficant), but stroke area was higher in normal conduction (7 +/- 4 versus 4 +/- 4 cm(2), P<0.05) as was area ejection fraction (0.17 +/- 0.11 versus 0. 10 +/- 0.08, P<0.01). In normal subjects, the summed percentage shortening of 10 midseptal chords was similar to that of 10 midfreewall chords (256 +/ - 16% versus 235 +/- 32%, not significant). In contrast, patients with hear t failure and normal conduction had greater midseptal. than midfreewall sum med chord shortening (113 +/- 18% versus 60 +/- 12%, P<0.05); patients with heart failure and LBBB had paradoxical septal motion (3 +/- 28, P<0.05 com pared with normal conduction). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with heart failure and normal conduction have an enha nced septal contribution to LV systolic function compared with normal subje cts. In heart failure with LBBB, this is lost, and the area ejection fracti on is lower. Strategies to optimize septal function in heart failure warran t further study.