Agroforestry, the association of trees with farming practices, is progressi
vely becoming a recognized land-use discipline. However, it is still percie
ved by some scientists, technicians and farmers as a sort of environmental
fashion which does not deserve credit. The peculiar history of agroforestry
and the complex relationships between agriculture and forestry explain som
e misunderstandings about the concepts and classification of agroforestry a
nd reveal that, contrarily to common perception, agroforestry is closer to
agriculture than to forestry. Based on field experience from several countr
ies, a structural classification of agroforestry into six simple categories
is proposed: crops under tree cover, agroforests, agroforestry in a linear
arrangement, animal agroforestry, sequential agroforestry and minor agrofo
restry techniques. It is argued that this pragmatic classification encompas
ses all major agroforestry associations and allows simultaneous agroforestr
y to be clearly differentiated from sequential agroforestry, two categories
showing contrasting ecological tree-crop interactions. It can also contrib
ute to a betterment of the image of agroforestry and lead to a simplificati
on of its definition. (C) 2000 Academie des sciences/Editions scientifiques
et medicales Elsevier SAS.