Should root and shoot temperature vary in synchrony to optimize nutrient up
take, particularly when there is a large difference in temperature from day
to night (DIF) of air and soil? To answer this question, tomato (Lycopersi
con esculentum Mill.) seedlings were grown in greenhouses with the air heat
ed to give either a + 14 degreesC DIF or a +5 degreesC DIF in air temperatu
re with a 16 degreesC mean. The root medium was either unheated except by t
he air, or heated to 21 degreesC constantly, only in the day, or only in th
e night. Experiments were repeated in early March and April in two years. O
verall, growth was faster and there were higher concentrations of elements
in leaves under +5 degreesC compared with + 14 degreesC air DIF, Root-zone
heating significantly increased growth and nutrition, compared with no heat
ing. There was a trend in growth and nutrient concentration with timing of
root heating: constant > day > night. These differences in growth and nutri
tion were similar under a +5 degreesC or +14 degreesC air DIF, and they wer
e slight compared with no root zone heating. For most nutrients, coordinati
on of root and shoot activity related to uptake and metabolism did not requ
ire synchronous variation of air and soil temperature. Uptake and transport
of nitrate was an exception. Heating roots in the day resulted in the high
est nitrate concentration in leaves under a +14 degreesC air DIF, whereas h
eating constantly was optimal under a +5 degreesC DIF. Our results indicate
nitrate metabolism did benefit from synchronous variation in air and root
temperature.