T. Kukulski et al., A comparison of regional myocardial velocity information derived by pulsedand color Doppler techniques: An in vitro and in vivo study, ECHOCARDIOG, 17(7), 2000, pp. 639-651
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY-A JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND AND ALLIED TECHNIQUES
The objective was to compare velocity information derived from either a tis
sue mimicking phantom or normal contracting myocardium by both pulsed wave
and color Doppler myocardial imaging (PWDMI and CDMI). Both CDMI and PWDMI
allow quantitative assessment of regional myocardial contraction and relaxa
tion velocities, but their potential clinical applications have not yet bee
n investigated. Moreover, no information is available as to whether they ca
n be used interchangeably for regional velocity assessment. For the in vitr
o study, a rotating, circular-shaped, tissue-mimicking sponge driven by a m
otor at speeds of 15, 30, 60, 90 rpm was used to derive velocity data from
the same eight points of interest by using PWDMI or CDMI techniques. For th
e in vivo study, 25 normal subjects were examined at rest using parasternal
and apical approaches. Velocity profiles were derived from the same 26 are
as of interest (18 left ventricular segments, 3 right ventricular segments,
and 5 measurement points for the tricuspid and mitral annuli) for each tec
hnique. Peak maximal velocities were detected by PWDMI and peak mean veloci
ties were measured using CDMI. The results of the in vitro study phantom sh
owed excellent correlation (r = 0.99, P < 0.001) and satisfactory agreement
(0.04 cm/sec; 3.3 cm/sec) between both Doppler techniques. PWDMI velocitie
s were higher than CDMI velocities by up to 20% and overestimated the real
velocity value (0.37 +/- 0.29 cm/sec) while CDMI underestimated predicted v
elocity by 1.35 +/- 0.36 cm/sec. Good correlation (r = 0.87, P < 0.001), bu
t poor agreement (-2.1 cm/sec; 5.4 cm/sec) was shown in vivo for all segmen
ts with regard to peak systolic and diastolic velocities. Both Doppler tech
niques cannot be used interchangeably for comparing peak velocities in, the
clinical situation. However, with adequate temporal resolution, they can b
e used interchangeably for velocity profile recording and for timing of eve
nts.