Comparative methodological analysis of erbB-2/HER-2 gene dosage, chromosomal copy number and protein overexpression in breast carcinoma tissues for diagnostic use

Citation
A. Bankfalvi et al., Comparative methodological analysis of erbB-2/HER-2 gene dosage, chromosomal copy number and protein overexpression in breast carcinoma tissues for diagnostic use, HISTOPATHOL, 37(5), 2000, pp. 411-419
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
HISTOPATHOLOGY
ISSN journal
03090167 → ACNP
Volume
37
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
411 - 419
Database
ISI
SICI code
0309-0167(200011)37:5<411:CMAOEG>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Aims: This study was performed to test the validity of different methods fo r determining the status of the erbB-2/HER-2 oncogene in breast cancer tiss ues for diagnostic use. Methods and results: Forty formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast carcino mas were investigated by fluorescence in situ and comparative genomic hybri dization (FISH, CGH) as well as by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using Dako-He rcepTest(TM) and CB11 antibody (Ventana). Additionally competitive-differen tial polymerase chain reaction (cdPCR) was performed on frozen samples to e stimate gene dosage alterations of erbB-2/HER-2, Amplification was detected in 12-23% and protein overexpression in 16-68% of the cases, depending on the methodology and/or the reagent used, Perfect concordance (100%) was fou nd between the results of cdPCR and CB11-IHC, and a 97% concordance between FISH and CB11-IHC, The concordance between Dako-HercepTest(TM) and CB11-IH C was 78%; seven of eight 2 + carcinomas with the Dako-HercepTest(TM) were classified as nonamplified using FISH. Conclusions: Our results indicate that high-level expression as well as nor mal erbB-2/HER-2 status of breast carcinomas can be detected reliably both by IHC and gene dosage assessment in paraffin material for diagnostic use. However, borderline results, especially those with 2 + immunopositivity, sh ould be interpreted with caution and increased emphasis should be given to other clinical and prognostic information available.