Rt. Cullen et al., Inhalation of poorly soluble particles. I. Differences in inflammatory response and clearance during exposure, INHAL TOXIC, 12(12), 2000, pp. 1089-1111
Results from animal studies have indicated some uncertainties over the vali
dity of a single general occupational control limit for all types of "parti
culates (insoluble) not otherwise classified" (PNOC) (ACGIH, 2000). Therefo
re, to examine the extent to which a given control limit may be valid for n
ontoxic dusts with different physical characteristics, this study compared
the pulmonary effects in rats of inhalation exposure to two poorly soluble
dusts of similar density and with relatively low toxicity: titanium dioxide
and barium sulfate. The objectives were to compare the dusts in (a) their
buildup and clearance in the lungs during inhalation; (b) their transfer to
lymph nodes; (c) the changes, with time, in the lavageable cell population
; and (d) the pathological change from histology. The exposure aerosol conc
entrations were selected to achieve similar mass and volume lung burdens Fo
r both dusts and to attain "overload" over the common exposure periods of a
bout 4 mo and 7 mo. Despite obtaining similar lung burdens for both dusts,
there was significantly more translocation of TiO2 to the hilar lymph nodes
than with BaSO4. it was also found that clearance of TiO2 was retarded whe
reas clearance of BaSO4 was not. Trends in these data were clarified by the
use of a simple model of particle clearance. Retardation of particle clear
ance and translocation to the lymph nodes are markers of the condition know
n as "overload" in which the alveolar macrophage-based clearance of particl
es from the deep lung is impaired. In addition, bronchoalveolar lavage show
ed that TiO2 caused significantly more recruitment of inflammatory neutroph
ils to lungs than BaSO4. These differences between the dusts were not due t
o differences in toxicity, solubility, or lung deposition. The explanation
that the different responses are dup to the different particle size distrib
utions of the two dust types is examined in a companion paper (Tran et al.,
this issue).