Mark-recapture studies of pinnipeds commonly use double-tagging to reduce b
ias of parameter estimates and to allow estimation of tag retention rates.
However, most tag retention estimates assume independence of tag loss. Here
we were able to identify when individual New Zealand fur seal (Arctocephal
us forsteri) pups had lost both tags; therefore, we tested the assumption o
f no association between the tag-loss rates of left and right tags. We also
tested for differences in tag retention among three different types of pla
stic tag (Allflex(R) cattle, mini and button tags), between two attachment
types (i.e., fixed or swivel), and whether retention varied among years and
colonies sampled. We found strong evidence of within-individual tag loss a
ssociation for most tags in most years, but little evidence that this varie
d among colonies. We found that ignoring within-individual association of t
ag loss led to a bias in estimated tag retention of 7.4-10.1%. Smaller rock
s and greater crevice and ledge densities in colonies were associated with
lower probabilities of tag retention. We suggest researchers should attempt
to use permanent marks in combination with tags to assess unbiased estimat
es of tag retention.