R. Amit et al., Does money matter?: Wealth attainment as the motive for initiating growth-oriented technology ventures, J BUS VENT, 16(2), 2001, pp. 119-143
The desire to attain personal wealth has long been regarded as the foremost
motive for entrepreneurship. Other goals and values, however, may also con
tribute to entrepreneurial motivation. Thus; the extent to which money matt
ers relative to other motives is an empirical question. In this study we ex
amine the role of wealth as the motive for the decision to found new ventur
es. Three focal questions guide our research: 1) does money matter more rel
ative to other decision dimensions in deciding to start a new high-technolo
gy venture? 2) does money matter more to entrepreneurs compared to non-entr
epreneurs? and 3) does money matter in absolute terms, that is, does a deci
sion model that focuses solely on the motive of wealth attainment parsimoni
ously predict entrepreneurs' start-lip decisions?
We conducted in-depth interviews with 51 entrepreneurs and a control group
of 28 senior managers who decided not to start ventures (non-entrepreneurs)
in the high-technology industry in British Columbia to address our researc
h questions. The motives we examined are wealth attainment and an aggregate
of other dimensions identified by entrepreneurs and managers. We consider-
ed three components of values: participants' ratings of the importance of v
arious decision dimensions, their rating of the salience of these dimension
s, and their satisfaction with prior levels of attainment on those decision
dimensions. We assessed beliefs as participants' perceived probability of
attaining desired level of a particular decision dimension in each of three
alternatives: the position held at the time the venture decision was made,
the venture itself; and the next best career alternative at that time. The
data were analyzed to compare entrepreneurs' values and beliefs regarding
wealth with an aggregate of other decision dimensions (our relative hypothe
ses, and with those of non-entrepreneurs (our comparative hypotheses).
Our findings do not support the common perception that money is the only, o
r even the most important, motive for entrepreneurs' decisions to start new
ventures. Wealth attainment was significantly less important to entreprene
urs relative to an aggregate of 10 other decision dimensions, and entrepren
eurs did not rate wealth as any more important than did non-entrepreneurs.
Non-entrepreneurs rated wealth res no more important than other motives. We
alth attainment was also significantly less salient to entrepreneurs' decis
ions to venture than were other motives. Non-entrepreneurs reported that we
alth,was significantly more salient to their decision against founding a ve
nture than other dimensions. In fact, non-entrepreneurs rated wealth attain
ment as significantly more salient to their decision against founding than
entrepreneurs rated it for their decision to proceed with starring a high-t
echnology business. A significant number of entrepreneurs starred businesse
s even when they believed that doing so offered them a lower probability of
obtaining their most desired level of wealth than did one of their other a
lternatives.
Satisfaction ratings and stated beliefs also dispute classical predictions.
Just prior to making the decision to venture, the entrepreneurs in our stu
dy were as satisfied with wealth as they were with other decision dimension
s. The non-entrepreneurs were actually more satisfied with wealth attainmen
t than with other dimensions. A comparison of the groups revealed no differ
ence in satisfaction with wealth attainment levels. Entrepreneurs did belie
ve that their chances of attaining their desired level of wealth were much
greater through founding a new high-technology venture than through their o
ther alternatives. This difference in beliefs, however, was not significant
ly greater than their optimistic beliefs about chances of attaining desired
levels of other dimensions. It was significantly higher compared to the no
n-entrepreneurs' belief difference measures for wealth. In fact, the entrep
reneurs' stated beliefs regarding the chances of attaining their desired le
vels of all dimensions were higher than those of the non-entrepreneurs, sug
gesting that entrepreneurs were simply more optimistic at the time of their
decision than non-entrepreneurs.Salience findings suggest that these optim
istic beliefs about wealth did nor motivate the founding decision alone
We can distinguish those people who successfully started ventures by their
regard for wealth as a less salient factor, and their beliefs in higher cha
nces of a venture producing monetary and other returns. Other motives, such
as innovation, vision, independence, and challenge were more important and
much more salient to this sample of entrepreneurs.
Our findings have implications for practice, teaching, and research. Ventur
e capitalists who partially base their assessment of entrepreneurs on the e
xtent to which they are motivated to make a great deal of money may benefit
from reconsideration of this criterion. We have evidence of one group of h
igh-technology entrepreneurs who achieved success without placing much deci
sion weight on attainment of personal wealth. Nascent entrepreneurs and tho
se who teach entrepreneurship can use this empirical finding to argue two m
ain points: 1) not all entrepreneurs found a business for personal wealth r
easons, and 2) one need nor be motivated by personal wealth attainment to b
e a successful entrepreneur. Similarly, theoretical models that assume mone
y is the primary motive for entrepreneurial activity require re-examination
. Future research in entrepreneurship should focus less on wealth attainmen
t and more on other motives for the venturing decision. A multiple-attribut
e decision model may be able to more fully explain venturing decisions. (C)
2000 Elsevier Science Inc.