Traditional control of nonprofit hospitals by the communities they serve ha
s been offered as justification for restraining antitrust enforcement of me
rgers that involve nonprofit hospitals. The community is arguably a constra
int on a nonprofit's inclination to exercise market power in the form of hi
gher prices; however, community control is likely to be attenuated for hosp
itals that through merger or acquisition become members of hospital systems
-particularly those that operate on a regional or multiregional basis. We r
eport findings from a study in which we examined empirically the relationsh
ip between market concentration and pricing patterns for three types of non
profit hospitals that are distinguishable based on degree of community cont
rol: an independent hospital, a member of a local hospital system, and a me
mber of a nonlocal hospital system. Study results indicated that when condi
tions existed to create a more concentrated market, (1) all three types of
nonprofit hospitals exercised market power in the form of higher prices, an
d (2) hospitals that were members of nonlocal systems were more aggressive
in exercising market power than were either independent or local system hos
pitals. The results have important implications for antitrust enforcement p
olicy.