K. Loeken et al., A NEW INSTRUMENT TO MEASURE PATIENT SATISFACTION WITH MAMMOGRAPHY - VALIDITY, RELIABILITY, AND DISCRIMINATORY POWER, Medical care, 35(7), 1997, pp. 731-741
OBJECTIVES. The benefit of mammography depends on repeated use. Theref
ore, surveying the mammographic quality as judged by the users address
es an important topic. The authors assess the practicality, validity,
reliability, and discriminatory power of a new, brief, multidimensiona
l questionnaire for measuring patient satisfaction with mammography. I
t-ems measuring discomfort and attitudes toward repeat adherence were
included. METHODS. A self-administered questionnaire was given to wome
n from six radiology departments in Norway Four hundred eighty-eight o
ut of 550 women referred for screening or diagnostic mammography were
included. Seventy-seven patients also completed the test/retest study,
and 44 women additionally completed an Australian questionnaire. Scor
es for patient satisfaction on the structure, process, discomfort, and
general satisfaction scales of the questionnaire were used as the mai
n outcome measures. RESULTS. Response rate was 89%, and rate of comple
tion was more than 95%. Strict psychometric criteria for construct val
idity and reliability were satisfied. Because lower levels of satisfac
tion were detectable with the new questionnaire but not with the Austr
alian questionnaire and because an acceptable degree of variability in
response was detected, support for discriminatory power was found. CO
NCLUSIONS. The discomfort dimension contributed substantially to valid
ity and discriminatory power. Patient behavior with time may be monito
red with the new questionnaire, thus representing a valuable tool for
scientific and practical purposes.