Unfixing the fixed pie: A motivated information-processing approach to integrative negotiation

Citation
Ckw. De Dreu et al., Unfixing the fixed pie: A motivated information-processing approach to integrative negotiation, J PERS SOC, 79(6), 2000, pp. 975-987
Citations number
76
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
ISSN journal
00223514 → ACNP
Volume
79
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
975 - 987
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3514(200012)79:6<975:UTFPAM>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Negotiators tend to believe that own and other's outcomes are diametrically opposed. When such fixed-pie perceptions (FPPs) are not revised during neg otiation, integrative agreements are unlikely. Lt was predicted that accura cy motivation helps negotiators to release their FPPs. In 2 experiments, ac curacy motivation was manipulated by (not) holding negotiators accountable for the manner in which they negotiated. Experiment 1 showed that accountab ility reduced FPPs during face-to-face negotiation and produced more integr ative agreements Experiment 2 corroborated these results: Accountable negot iators revised their FPPs even when information exchange was experimentally held constant. Experiment 2 also showed that accountability is effective d uring the encoding of outcome information. Negotiators appear flexible in t heir reliance on FPPs, which is consistent with a motivated information-pro cessing model of negotiation.