Purpose: We reviewed our experience with pedal branch artery (PBA) bypass t
o confirm the role of these target arteries for limb salvage and to identif
y patient and technical factors that may be associated with graft patency a
nd limb salvage.
Methods: In. this retrospective study we analyzed 24 vein grafts to PBAs pe
rformed from 1988 to 1998 for limb salvage in 23 patients who had no suitab
le tibial, peroneal, or dorsal pedal target arteries. These PEA grafts were
compared with 133 perimalleolar posterior tibial, defined at or below the
ankle, or dorsalis pedis bypass grafts performed contemporaneously; the Kap
lan-Meier life table was used in the analysis of graft patency and limb sal
vage. Life table analyses and logistic regression analysis of prognostic pa
tient variables were also performed.
Results: The PEA bypass represented 3% of infrainguinal revascularizations
for chronic critical limb ischemia at our institution over the study period
. Patients who received PEA bypasses were more likely to be male (92% vs 69
%, P = .02) with lower incidences of overt coronary artery disease (33% vs
50%, P = .12) and stroke (0% vs 15%, P = .04), and a higher incidence of en
d-stage renal disease (21% vs 8%, P = .06) than those undergoing perimalleo
lar bypass. Seventeen percent of PEA bypasses were performed with the anter
ior lateral malleolar artery, a vessel not previously described as a common
bypass target. Two-year primary patency and limb salvage for PEA versus pe
rimalleolar bypass was 70% versus 80% (P = .16) and 78% versus 91% (P = .28
), respectively. Patency and Limb salvage rates were no different in bypass
es with above-knee or below-knee inflow arteries.
Conclusion: An autogenous vein bypass to the PEA, though rarely required, p
rovides acceptable primary patency and limb salvage when compared with peri
malleolar tibial artery bypass when no suitable, more proximal target arter
ies are available. The PEA bypass should be considered before major amputat
ion is undertaken.