Pedal branch artery bypass: A viable limb salvage option

Citation
Jp. Connors et al., Pedal branch artery bypass: A viable limb salvage option, J VASC SURG, 32(6), 2000, pp. 1071-1077
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY
ISSN journal
07415214 → ACNP
Volume
32
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1071 - 1077
Database
ISI
SICI code
0741-5214(200012)32:6<1071:PBABAV>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Purpose: We reviewed our experience with pedal branch artery (PBA) bypass t o confirm the role of these target arteries for limb salvage and to identif y patient and technical factors that may be associated with graft patency a nd limb salvage. Methods: In. this retrospective study we analyzed 24 vein grafts to PBAs pe rformed from 1988 to 1998 for limb salvage in 23 patients who had no suitab le tibial, peroneal, or dorsal pedal target arteries. These PEA grafts were compared with 133 perimalleolar posterior tibial, defined at or below the ankle, or dorsalis pedis bypass grafts performed contemporaneously; the Kap lan-Meier life table was used in the analysis of graft patency and limb sal vage. Life table analyses and logistic regression analysis of prognostic pa tient variables were also performed. Results: The PEA bypass represented 3% of infrainguinal revascularizations for chronic critical limb ischemia at our institution over the study period . Patients who received PEA bypasses were more likely to be male (92% vs 69 %, P = .02) with lower incidences of overt coronary artery disease (33% vs 50%, P = .12) and stroke (0% vs 15%, P = .04), and a higher incidence of en d-stage renal disease (21% vs 8%, P = .06) than those undergoing perimalleo lar bypass. Seventeen percent of PEA bypasses were performed with the anter ior lateral malleolar artery, a vessel not previously described as a common bypass target. Two-year primary patency and limb salvage for PEA versus pe rimalleolar bypass was 70% versus 80% (P = .16) and 78% versus 91% (P = .28 ), respectively. Patency and Limb salvage rates were no different in bypass es with above-knee or below-knee inflow arteries. Conclusion: An autogenous vein bypass to the PEA, though rarely required, p rovides acceptable primary patency and limb salvage when compared with peri malleolar tibial artery bypass when no suitable, more proximal target arter ies are available. The PEA bypass should be considered before major amputat ion is undertaken.