Comparison of fluoroquinolone pharmacokinetic parameters after treatment with marbofloxacin, enrofloxacin, and difloxacin in dogs

Citation
Dl. Frazier et al., Comparison of fluoroquinolone pharmacokinetic parameters after treatment with marbofloxacin, enrofloxacin, and difloxacin in dogs, J VET PHARM, 23(5), 2000, pp. 293-302
Citations number
53
Categorie Soggetti
Veterinary Medicine/Animal Health
Journal title
JOURNAL OF VETERINARY PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS
ISSN journal
01407783 → ACNP
Volume
23
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
293 - 302
Database
ISI
SICI code
0140-7783(200010)23:5<293:COFPPA>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Plasma, urine, and skin drug concentrations were determined for dogs (n = 1 2) given five daily oral doses of marbofloxacin (MAR) (2.75 mg/kg), enroflo xacin (ENR) (5.0 mg/kg) or difloxacin (DIF) (5.0 mg/kg), Concentrations of the active metabolite of ENR, ciprofloxacin (CIP), were also determined. Th e three-period, three-treatment crossover experimental design included a 21 -day washout period between treatments. Area under the plasma drug concentr ation vs, time curve (AUC(O-last), mug/mL x h of MAR was greater than for E NR, CIP, ENR/CIP combined, and DIP, Maximum concentration (C-max) of MAR wa s greater than ENR, CIP, and DIF. Time of maximum plasma concentration (T-m ax) was similar for MAR and DIF; T-max occurred earlier for ENR and later f or CIP. Plasma half-life (t(1/2)) of MAR was longer than for ENR, CIP, and DIF. Urine concentrations of DIF were less than MAR or ENR/CIP combined, bu t urine concentrations of MAR and ENR/CIP combined did not differ. DIF skin concentrations were less than the concentrations of MAR or ENR/CIP combine d 2 h after dosing, but skin concentrations of MAR and ENR/CIP combined did not differ.