Drawing on theoretical developments in the arbitration literature, and in p
articular the concepts of 'error' and 'intent', this paper uses data from t
he 1992 Survey of Industrial Tribunal Applications to identify the factors
associated with the stage at which resolution of individual employment disp
utes occurs. Resolution at 'conciliation' is primarily determined by applic
ants' characteristics (most notably gender) and by case jurisdiction, whils
t subsequent 'pre-tribunal' resolution is driven largely by employer and ca
se characteristics. The results are consistent with an error/intent interpr
etation. ACAS intervention appears to promote 'settlement' but does not enh
ance the overall resolution rate.