Structural and depositional controls on the distribution of the Upper Jurassic shallow marine sandstones in the Fife and Angus fields area, Quadrants31 & 39, UK Central North Sea
F. Spathopoulos et al., Structural and depositional controls on the distribution of the Upper Jurassic shallow marine sandstones in the Fife and Angus fields area, Quadrants31 & 39, UK Central North Sea, MAR PETR G, 17(9), 2000, pp. 1053-1082
An integrated evaluation of the tectonic and depositional history of the Up
per Jurassic of the Fife and Angus area of UK Quadrants 31 and 39 has been
carried out through 3D seismic interpretation and a range of geological stu
dies. Sedimentological and petrological data indicate that the Upper Jurass
ic sands in the study area are the lateral equivalents of the Fulmar Format
ion. They can be divided into three groups of sandstones, deposited by diff
erent processes during an interval of almost 10 million years: (i) open she
lf, Group 1 sandstones comprise sands dominated by storm/wave activity, whi
ch accumulated in fault-bounded mini-basins ('embayments'); (ii) Group 2 sa
ndstones, possibly deposited by storm-induced flows; and (iii) Group 3 sand
stones, which may represent subaqueous dunes deposited in a tidally-influen
ced, shallow marine environment.
Sedimentological and heavy mineral studies suggest that the sands in the st
udy area were sourced from the adjacent Mid North Sea High and were transpo
rted along the shelf probably by wave, storm and tide-generated currents. B
iostratigraphic dating indicates that the Upper Jurassic sands in the Fife/
Angus area were deposited during Late Kimmeridgian to upper Middle Volgian.
An earlier depositional period with a possible Callovian age is also infer
red. Deposition of Jurassic sediments in the study area occurred during two
transgression periods (Callovian and upper Late Jurassic), separated by an
erosional/non-depositional phase (Oxfordian to Middle Kimmeridgian). The a
ccumulation of Late Jurassic sands started in the Fife embayment and progre
ssed northwards. It was confined, however, to the eastern side of the embay
ments, possibly due to the hydrodynamic conditions of the area. (C) 2000 El
sevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.