Icelandic fisheries have been managed by individual transferable quotas (IT
Qs) for a decade but there is still no consensus about the quota issue. Dis
tributional effects of ITQs, in terms of income distribution between owner
and crew, and the vulnerability of fisheries communities short of quota, ha
ve been in the centre of the debate.
The author discusses changes in stakeholder involvement in policy-making, c
onflicts of interest and legal disputes linked to the ITQ-system. By way of
conclusion, some options for resolving conflicts and reaching consensus on
the fisheries management issue are discussed. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Lt
d. All rights reserved.