Bone composition and strength of female rats subjected to different rates of weight reduction

Citation
Cz. Wang et al., Bone composition and strength of female rats subjected to different rates of weight reduction, NUTR RES, 20(11), 2000, pp. 1613-1622
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
NUTRITION RESEARCH
ISSN journal
02715317 → ACNP
Volume
20
Issue
11
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1613 - 1622
Database
ISI
SICI code
0271-5317(200011)20:11<1613:BCASOF>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Seventy-two rats (7 months old) were assigned into three dietary groups. Th e control group was fed ad lib AIN-76 diet, the R60 group a diet providing 60%, and the R40 group a diet providing 40% of the energy consumed by the c ontrol group. During the initial 4 weeks before switching to the R40 diet, the R40 group was fed the same as the control. At week 8, 8 rats each from R60 and R40 groups were given energy supplement plus the assigned diets for 4 weeks to regain their lost body weight before killed at week 12 (R60R an d R40R groups). Eight rats from the control group were killed at the beginn ing. Eight rats each from the control, R60 and R40 groups were killed at we ek 8 and 12. Body weight of R60 group decreased within 8 weeks and that of R40 group did within 4 weeks both by 24% of their initial body weight, indi cating the weight reduction rate for the R40 group was twice that of the R6 0 group. The R60 group had lower bone density, breaking strength, and bone Ca content (all at P < 0.05) than the R40 group at week 8 and 12. Bone dens ity, breaking strength, ash weight, and Ca content became lower from week 8 to week 12 for R60 and R40 groups. At week 12, fat-free bone weight, ash w eight, and Ca content were higher for the control than for the other groups (P < 0.05), but they were not different between R60 and R60R or between R4 0 and R40R. In conclusion, body weight reduction at a slower rate resulted in more bone loss than a similar extent of weight reduction at a faster rat e. Regardless of the weight reduction rate, bone density, breaking strength , ash weight, and Ca content could not recover along with body weight regai n. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.