As genetically modified (GM) products approach the market stage, the UK gov
ernment and agro-food industry have faced a suspicious or hostile public. S
ince 1998 many retail chains have undertaken to exclude any GM-derived ingr
edients from their own-brand lines. This commercial blockage has intensifie
d pressures for greater precaution, even for a moratorium on cultivating CM
crops. Political protest has led to strategies for precautionary commercia
lization. Government and industry have cooperated to plan a managed develop
ment" of CM crops. Across the agricultural supply chain, industry has devis
ed voluntary guidelines to ensure segregation of CM crops and to limit the
spread of GM herbicide-tolerance, In particular UK regulators seek to test
the risk that broad-spectrum herbicide sprays could damage wildlife habitat
s; they have broadened the advisory expertise accordingly
These measurer open up the precautionary content to further debate, at both
national and EU levels. Market-stage precautions establish a means to test
claims that GM crops are environmentally-friendly products. By translating
public concerns into broader risk-assessment criteria, the UK procedure in
volves critics in potentially influencing standards of scientific evidence
and environmental harm. This social process has become a prerequisite for l
egitimizing commercial use.