Five-year clinical experience with Abiomed BVS 5000 as a ventricular assist device for cardiac failure

Citation
Rj. Dekkers et al., Five-year clinical experience with Abiomed BVS 5000 as a ventricular assist device for cardiac failure, PERFUSION-U, 16(1), 2001, pp. 13-18
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
PERFUSION-UK
ISSN journal
02676591 → ACNP
Volume
16
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
13 - 18
Database
ISI
SICI code
0267-6591(200101)16:1<13:FCEWAB>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Mechanical support for the failing heart has interested and challenged card iac specialists for decades. In the United States alone, there are close to 375 000 cardiac surgical procedures performed each year, and, despite the recent advances in myocardial protection, surgical techniques, intra-aortic balloon therapy and maximal pharmacological support, postoperative ventric ular dysfunction continues to occur in 0.5-1.0% of all patients undergoing cardiac surgery. This retrospective review describes our 5-year clinical experience at the B righam and Women's Hospital with the Abiomed BVS 5000 as a means of ventric ular support. During the period of 1994 to present, 7428 cardiac surgical o perations were performed at our institution. The Abiomed BVS 5000 has been implanted in 47 patients exhibiting ventricular failure. There were 38 pati ents in the bridge-to-recovery group and nine patients in the bridge-to-tra nsplantation group. Twenty-five patients (66%) in the bridge-to-recovery group were weaned and 16 patients (42%) went on to discharge. In the bridge-to-transplantation gr oup, one patient actually recovered myocardial function and one expired on the device. The remaining seven patients (77%) underwent cardiac transplant ation with post-transplant survival at 66%. Overall, patients were supporte d in the isolated left ventricular mode (28%), in the biventricular mode (4 5%) and in the isolated right ventricular mode (28%). The Abiomed BVS 5000 has been shown to be a safe and simple cardiac support system with no mechanical failure. Our experience shows that a substantial number of patients suffering from ventricular failure will benefit from th e use of this device. The results also justify the use of this device in gr oups of patients other that of postcardiotomy ventricular failure.