DBA/2J mice develop stronger lithium chloride-induced conditioned taste and place aversions than C57BL/6J mice

Citation
Fo. Risinger et Cl. Cunningham, DBA/2J mice develop stronger lithium chloride-induced conditioned taste and place aversions than C57BL/6J mice, PHARM BIO B, 67(1), 2000, pp. 17-24
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR
ISSN journal
00913057 → ACNP
Volume
67
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
17 - 24
Database
ISI
SICI code
0091-3057(200009)67:1<17:DMDSLC>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Genetic differences in lithium-induced conditioned aversion were examined u sing both place- and taste-conditioning procedures. In the place- condition ing procedure, adult male C57BL/6J (B6) and DBA/2J (D2) mice were exposed t o a differential conditioning procedure in which each mouse received four 3 0 - min pairings of a distinctive floor cue immediately after IP injections of either 0.75, 1.5, or 3.0 mEq/kg LiCl. A different floor cue was paired with saline injections. A separate group of control mice received saline in jections paired with both floor types. Subsequent floor preference testing revealed greater conditioned aversion in D2 mice compared to B6 mice in gro ups receiving 3.0 mEq/kg LiCl. Lower LiCl doses did not produce conditionin g in either strain. In a conditioned taste-aversion procedure, fluid-restri cted mice received four trials in which access to 0.2 M NaCl solution was f ollowed by IP injection of either 0.75, 1.5, 3.0, or 6.0 mEq/ kg LiCl. D2 m ice showed stronger conditioned taste aversion than B6 mice at all doses, s uggesting that taste conditioning may be a more sensitive index of aversive drug sensitivity than place conditioning. These findings are not well expl ained by strain differences in general learning ability or by strain differ ences in stimulus salience or innate preference. Rather, these data appear more consistent with previous studies showing strain differences in lithium pharmacokinetics and in general sensitivity to aversive events. (C) 2000 E lsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.