Re. Genovese et al., Behavioral and neural toxicity of the artemisinin antimalarial, arteether,but not artesunate and artelinate, in rats, PHARM BIO B, 67(1), 2000, pp. 37-44
Three artemisinin antimalarials, arteether (AE), artesunate (AS), and artel
inate (AL) were evaluated in rats using an auditory discrimination task (AD
T) and neurohistology. After rats were trained on the ADT, equimolar doses
of AE (25 mg/kg, in sesame oil, n = 6), AS (31 mg/kg, in sodium carbonate,
n = 6), and AL (36 mg/kg, in saline, n = 6), or vehicle (sodium carbonate,
n = 6) were administered (WI) for 7 consecutive days. Behavioral performanc
e was evaluated, during daily sessions, before, during, and after administr
ation. Histological evaluation of the brains was performed using thionine s
taining, and damaged cells were counted in specific brainstem nuclei of all
rats. Behavioral performance was not significantly affected in any rats tr
eated with AS, AL, or vehicle. Furthermore, histological examination of the
brains of rats treated with AS, AL, and vehicle did not show damage. In st
ark contrast, all rats treated with AE showed a progressive and severe decl
ine in performance on the ADT. The deficit was characterized by decreases i
n accuracy, increases in response time and, eventually, response suppressio
n. When performance on the ADT was suppressed, rats also showed gross behav
ioral signs of toxicity that included tremor, gait disturbances, and lethar
gy. Subsequent histological assessment of AE-treated rats revealed marked d
amage in the brainstem nuclei, ruber, superior olive, trapezoideus, and inf
erior vestibular. The damage included chromatolysis, necrosis, and gliosis.
These results demonstrate distinct differences in the ability of artemisin
ins to produce neurotoxicity. Further research is needed to uncover pharmac
okinetic and metabolic differences in artemisinins that may predict neuroto
xic potential. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.