Sucrose intake as a function of its cost and the cost of chow

Citation
G. Collier et Df. Johnson, Sucrose intake as a function of its cost and the cost of chow, PHYSL BEHAV, 70(5), 2000, pp. 477-487
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology,"Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR
ISSN journal
00319384 → ACNP
Volume
70
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
477 - 487
Database
ISI
SICI code
0031-9384(20000915)70:5<477:SIAAFO>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
The avid consumption of pure carbohydrate solutions, which often results in a distortion of nutrient balance, is generally presumed to be driven by th eir taste. In the first of two experiments, we examined the effect of consu mption cost on rats' intake of three concentrations of sucrose solution (8% , 16%, and 32%) when a nutritionally complete chow was concurrently freely available. In the second experiment, we examined the intake of 24% sucrose solution and chow as the consumption costs of both were varied. Increasing the cost of sucrose resulted in a reduction in the percent calories taken f rom sucrose; the steepness of the decline in intake with price was inversel y related to the sucrose concentration and to the cost of chow. Chow calori es were substituted for relatively expensive sucrose calories. An increase in the cost of chow resulted in a reduction in the percent of calories take n from chow and a protein-poor diet. The cost of sucrose did not affect the slope of the chow intake curve, presumably because, despite its sweet tast e, sucrose was not a substitute for the protein, fat, and micronutrients in chow. Total caloric intake was conserved in all cases. Thus, the avid cons umption of sucrose solution is curtailed when it is costly; but the degree of change in intake with cost depends on the cost of an alternative food. T hese results suggest that diet selection involves a comparison not only of the taste and post-ingestive consequences of available foods, but also of t he cost of calories and nutrients in the foods. Selection appears to be gui ded first by caloric requirements and the relative cost of calories, then b y nutrient requirements and the relative cost of nutrients, and finally by taste. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. Ail rights reserved.