Tumor M2 pyruvate kinase in renal cell carcinoma. Patient plasma examination

Citation
J. Roigas et al., Tumor M2 pyruvate kinase in renal cell carcinoma. Patient plasma examination, UROLOGE A, 39(6), 2000, pp. 554-556
Citations number
8
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
UROLOGE A
ISSN journal
03402592 → ACNP
Volume
39
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
554 - 556
Database
ISI
SICI code
0340-2592(200011)39:6<554:TMPKIR>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Tumor cell metabolism is characterized by a high rate of aerobic glycolysis . The metabolic differences require changes in glycolytic enzyme activities and isoenzyme patterns. The inactive form of the M2 pyruvate kinase (Tu M2 -PK) is specifically expressed in tumor cells and has been detected immunoh istochemically in tumor tissue but also in peripheral blood of patients wit h different malignant tumors. In this study,Tu MZ-PK in the plasma of patie nts with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was compared with healthy volunteers. T u M2-PK was quantified with a commercially available enzyme linked immunoso rbent assay (ELISA) kit. Using the ELISA kit, plasma probes of 57 healthy i ndividuals were compared to 63 patients with RCC (51 patients with non-meta static RCC, 12 patients with metastatic RCC). Statistical analysis was perf ormed with the non-parametric ANOVA test according to Kruskal-Wallis. In pa tients with renal cell carcinoma,Tu M2-PK was significantly higher than in healthy volunteers. For organ-defined, non-metastatic tumors, sensitivity w as only 27.5%, if the 95% reference values of the control group were used f or discrimination. The differences were more pronounced in patients with me tastatic disease. Tu M2-PK was significantly enhanced compared to healthy c ontrols, but also to the group with non-metastatic disease, the sensitivity was 66.7%. Our data show that Tu M2-PK has no impact as an unspecific mark er for the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma. This is especially relevant t o organ-defined, non-metastatic RCC. In advanced metastatic disease, a pote ntial importance as a parameter for treatment control in palliative therape utic approaches can be assumed, and warrants further investigations.