I. Kopp et al., Management of patients with rectal carcinoma. Classical outcomes and implementation of the quality of life concept into medical care, ZBL CHIR, 125(12), 2000, pp. 940-946
Quality of life (QL) assessment by means of standardised scales allows a va
lid representation of an individual's subjective sense of well-being in thr
ee dimensions: somatic (intensity and frequency of symptoms), psychological
(anxiety, depression) and social (family life, employment, sexuality). The
question, however, whether routine measurement, documentation and analysis
of QL-data could lead to an improvement of patient care is still unsolved.
Studies with a clearly defined practical goal in collaboration with physic
ians and patients should help to resolve this issue. The introduction of th
e QL concept into everyday clinical practice first requires that this tool
is understandable and valuable to the clinician. In this respect, we propos
e to integrate the factor QL into a broader outcome-concept in parallel to
the classical quality indicators (outcome-criteria), to demonstrate individ
ual patient's clinical and therapeutical course in the form of QL-profiles
and to correlate the patient's actual clinical and psychosocial situation w
ith the results of QL measurement. We illustrate the feasability of a stepw
ise concept of implementation of the QL concept by demonstrating interim re
sults of our field trial on regional management and care of patients with r
ectal carcinoma in the county of Marburg-Biedenkopf.