Wm. Whitten et al., Subtribal and generic relationship of Maxillarieae (Orchidaceae) with emphasis on Stanhopeinae: combined molecular evidence, AM J BOTANY, 87(12), 2000, pp. 1842-1856
The monophyly of and phylogenetic relationships within the orchid tribe Max
illarieae Pfitzer were evaluated using parsimony analyses of combined nucle
ar ribosomal and plastid DNA sequence data of ITS 1 and 2, matK, and the tr
nL intron and the trnL-F intergene spacer. Each of the separate analyses pr
oduced highly congruent but weakly supported patterns (by the bootstrap), s
o these were combined in a single analysis. Analysis of 90 ingroup taxa (re
presenting similar to 35% of currently recognized genera) and four outgroup
taxa produced resolved and highly supported cladograms. Based on the clado
grams, we recognize six subtribes: Eriopsidinae, Oncidiinae (including Pach
yphyllinae. Ornithocephalinae, and Telipogoninae), Stanhopeinae, Coeliopsid
inae, Maxillariinae (including Ly castinae and Bifrenariinae), and Zygopeta
linae (including Cryptarrheninae. Dichaeinae, Huntleyinae, and Warreinae).
Stanhopeinae were sampled most intensively; their generic relationships wer
e highly resolved in the analysis and largely agree with currently accepted
generic concepts based on morphology. Coeliopsidinae (Coeliopsis, Lycomorm
ium, Peristeria) are sister to Stanhopeinae. Correlations are drawn among p
hylogeny, pollination mechanisms, and life history traits.