C. Mendoza et al., Absorption of iron from unmodified maize and genetically altered, low-phytate maize fortified with ferrous sulfate or sodium iron EDTA, AM J CLIN N, 73(1), 2001, pp. 80-85
Background: Reducing the phytate content in grains by genetic manipulation
is a novel approach to increasing nonheme-iron absorption from mixed diets.
Fractional iron absorption from a genetically modified strain of low-phyta
te maize (LPM) increased significantly, by 50%.
Objective: We assessed iron absorption from porridges prepared from the sam
e LPM (lpa-1-1 mutant) and unmodified wild-type maize (WTM), both of which
were fortified with either ferrous sulfate or sodium iron EDTA.
Design: Porridges providing 3.4 mg Fe were fortified with either ferrous su
lfate or sodium iron EDTA to provide an additional 1 mg Fe/serving. In 14 n
onanemic women, iron absorption was measured as the amount of radioiron inc
orporated into red blood cells (extrinsic tag method) 12 d after consumptio
n of the study diets.
Results: No significant effect of phytate content on iron absorption was fo
und when porridge was fortified with either sodium iron EDTA or ferrous sul
fate. Fractional absorption of iron from WTM porridge fortified with sodium
iron EDTA (5.73%) was 3.39 times greater than that from the same porridge
fortified with ferrous sulfate (1.69%). Fractional absorption of iron from
the sodium iron EDTA-fortified LPM porridge (5.40%) was 2.82 times greater
than that from LPM porridge fortified with ferrous sulfate (1.91%) (P < 0.0
001 for both comparisons, repeated-measures analysis of variance). Thus, th
e previously identified benefit of LPM was no longer detectable when maize
porridge was fortified with additional iron.
Conclusion: Iron was absorbed more efficiently when the fortificant was sod
ium iron EDTA rather than ferrous sulfate, regardless of the type of maize.