Ball urethroplasty combined with Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz urethropexy versus suburethral sling in patients with intrinsic sphincter deficiency and urethral hypermobility
M. Alcalay et al., Ball urethroplasty combined with Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz urethropexy versus suburethral sling in patients with intrinsic sphincter deficiency and urethral hypermobility, AM J OBST G, 183(6), 2000, pp. 1348-1353
OBJECTIVE: It was our goal to compare the efficacy of a suburethral fascial
sling with that of a combination of-Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz urethropexy
and Ball urethroplasty in patients with intrinsic sphincter deficiency and
urethral hypermobility.
STUDY DESIGN: This study consisted of a retrospective observational evaluat
ion of patients from 2 separate practice sites. Preoperative and postoperat
ive data were collected from patients' medical records. The long-term resul
ts were based on a mailed questionnaire addressing bladder symptoms and qua
lity-of-life issues.
RESULTS: Among a total of 48 patients, 37 (77. 1 %) responded in the group
undergoing Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz urethropexy combined with Ball urethro
plasty, and 30 out of 35 (85.7%) patients replied in the suburethral fascia
l sling group. The mean length of follow-up was 2.7 years (range, 1-5 years
). The patients were similar in age, hormonal status, parity, and previous
bladder neck surgery. Similar cure and improvement were demonstrated in bot
h groups (86.6% in the suburethral fascia group and 89.2% in the group with
the Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz procedure combined with Ball urethroplasty).
No significant differences were found in urinary incontinence types, irrit
able bladder symptoms, voiding difficulties, or quality-of-life measures.
CONCLUSIONS: The suburethral fascial sling and a procedure consisting of Ma
rshall-Marchetti-Krantz urethropexy combined with Ball urethroplasty have s
imilar results in patients with intrinsic sphincter and urethral hypermobil
ity.