OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to analyze our experience with low (8-1
2 cm above the anal verge) and very low (<6 cm above the anal verge) colore
ctal resection and primary anastomosis at the time of radical en bloc resec
tion of pelvic malignancies.
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of 77 patients undergoing supralevator
pelvic exenteration with low colorectal resection and primary anastomosis
in our gynecologic oncology service was carried out. Data were obtained fro
m patient medical records and from the tumor registry. Univariate statistic
al analysis of the data was used.
RESULTS: The distribution of primary malignancies in this cohort was as fol
lows: 33 (43%) recurrent or primary cervical carcinomas, 27 (35%) primary o
r recurrent ovarian carcinomas, 7 (9%) recurrent vaginal carcinomas, 4 (5%)
endometrial carcinomas, 3 (4%) colon carcinomas, and 3 (4%) cases of stage
IV endometriosis. Forty patients underwent total pelvic exenteration, and
37 patients underwent posterior exenteration. Thirty-six patients in the to
tal pelvic exenteration group had a history of pelvic irradiation. Twelve (
30%) of these patients had development of breakdown or fistulas of the anas
tomosis. Six of the 12 patients (50%) had undergone protective colostomy. T
hirty-seven patients underwent posterior exenteration with primary anastomo
sis for ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer, colon cancer, or endometriosis,
and only 1 of these had received pelvic irradiation. This patient did not
have a protective colostomy, and a rectovaginal fistula developed. in addit
ion, there were 3 other breakdowns in the posterior exenteration group. Fin
ally, the presence of preoperative ascites did not appear to alter the brea
kdown rate of the anastomosis among the patients with ovarian cancer who un
derwent cytoreductive surgery.
CONCLUSION: Radical resection of pelvic tissue remains a crucial part of th
e armamentarium of the gynecologic oncologist. Previous pelvic irradiation
appears to be a major risk factor (35% vs 7.5%) for anastomotic breakdown a
nd fistulas, independent of the presence of a protective colostomy. The ove
rall results appear to be better for patients undergoing this procedure as
part of a posterior exenteration.