Nature conservation is increasingly based on a landscape approach rather th
an a species approach. Landscape planning that includes nature conservation
goals requires integrated ecological tools. However, species differ widely
in their response to landscape change. We propose a framework of ecologica
lly scaled landscape indices that takes into account this variation. Our ap
proach is based on a combination of field studies of spatially structured p
opulations (metapopulations) and model simulations in artificial landscapes
. From these, we seek generalities in the relationship among species featur
es, landscape indices, and metapopulation viability. The concept of ecologi
cal species profiles is used to group species according to characteristics
that are important in metapopulations' response to landscape change: indivi
dual area requirements as the dominant characteristic of extinction risk in
landscape patches and dispersal distance as the main determinant of the ab
ility to colonize patches. The ecological profiles and landscape indices ar
e then integrated into two ecologically scaled landscape indices (ESLI): av
erage patch carrying capacity and average patch connectivity. The field dat
a show that the fraction of occupied habitat patches is correlated with the
two ESLI. To put the ESLI into a perspective of metapopulation persistence
, we determine the viability for six ecological profiles at different degre
es of habitat fragmentation using a metapopulation model and computer-gener
ated landscapes. The model results show that the fraction of occupied patch
es is a good indicator for metapopulation viability. We discuss how ecologi
cal profiles, ESLI, and the viability threshold can be applied for landscap
e planning and design in nature conservation.