The quantitative risks of mesothelioma and lung cancer in relation to asbestos exposure

Citation
Jt. Hodgson et A. Darnton, The quantitative risks of mesothelioma and lung cancer in relation to asbestos exposure, ANN OCCUP H, 44(8), 2000, pp. 565-601
Citations number
73
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE
ISSN journal
00034878 → ACNP
Volume
44
Issue
8
Year of publication
2000
Pages
565 - 601
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-4878(200012)44:8<565:TQROMA>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Mortality reports on asbestos exposed cohorts which gave information on exp osure levels from which las a minimum) a cohort average cumulative exposure could be estimated were reviewed. At exposure levels seen in occupational cohorts it is concluded that the exposure specific risk of mesothelioma fro m the three principal commercial asbestos types is broadly in the ratio 1:1 00:500 for chrysotile, amosite and crocidolite respectively, For lung cance r the conclusions are less clear cut, Cohorts exposed only to crocidolite o r amosite record similar exposure specific risk levels (around 5% excess lu ng cancer per f/ml.yr); but chrysotile exposed cohorts show a less consiste nt picture, with a clear discrepancy between the mortality experience of a cohort of chrysotile textile workers in Carolina and the Quebec miners coho rt. Taking account of the excess risk recorded by cohorts with mixed fibre exposures (generally<1%), the Carolina experience looks uptypically high, I t is suggested that a best estimate lung cancer risk for chrysotile alone w ould be 0.1%, with a highest reasonable estimate of 0.5%. The risk differen tial between chrysotile and the two amphibole fibres for lung cancer is thu s between 1:10 and 1:50, Examination of the inter-study dose response relationship for the amphibole fibres suggests a non-linear relationship for all three cancer endpoints ( pleural and peritoneal mesotheliomas. and lung cancer), The peritoneal meso thelioma risk is proportional to the square of cumulative exposure, lung ca ncer risk lies between a linear and square relationship and pleural mesothe lioma seems to rise less than linearly with cumulative dose. Although these non-linear relationships provide a best fit to the data, statistical and o ther uncertainties mean that a linear relationship remains arguable for ple ural and lung tumours (but not for peritoneal tumours, Based on these considerations, and a discussion of the associated uncertain ties, a series of quantified risk summary statements for different levels o f cumulative exposure are presented. Crown Copyright (C) 2000 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd on behalf of British Occupational Hygiene Society. All rights reserved.