Jt. Hodgson et A. Darnton, The quantitative risks of mesothelioma and lung cancer in relation to asbestos exposure, ANN OCCUP H, 44(8), 2000, pp. 565-601
Mortality reports on asbestos exposed cohorts which gave information on exp
osure levels from which las a minimum) a cohort average cumulative exposure
could be estimated were reviewed. At exposure levels seen in occupational
cohorts it is concluded that the exposure specific risk of mesothelioma fro
m the three principal commercial asbestos types is broadly in the ratio 1:1
00:500 for chrysotile, amosite and crocidolite respectively, For lung cance
r the conclusions are less clear cut, Cohorts exposed only to crocidolite o
r amosite record similar exposure specific risk levels (around 5% excess lu
ng cancer per f/ml.yr); but chrysotile exposed cohorts show a less consiste
nt picture, with a clear discrepancy between the mortality experience of a
cohort of chrysotile textile workers in Carolina and the Quebec miners coho
rt. Taking account of the excess risk recorded by cohorts with mixed fibre
exposures (generally<1%), the Carolina experience looks uptypically high, I
t is suggested that a best estimate lung cancer risk for chrysotile alone w
ould be 0.1%, with a highest reasonable estimate of 0.5%. The risk differen
tial between chrysotile and the two amphibole fibres for lung cancer is thu
s between 1:10 and 1:50,
Examination of the inter-study dose response relationship for the amphibole
fibres suggests a non-linear relationship for all three cancer endpoints (
pleural and peritoneal mesotheliomas. and lung cancer), The peritoneal meso
thelioma risk is proportional to the square of cumulative exposure, lung ca
ncer risk lies between a linear and square relationship and pleural mesothe
lioma seems to rise less than linearly with cumulative dose. Although these
non-linear relationships provide a best fit to the data, statistical and o
ther uncertainties mean that a linear relationship remains arguable for ple
ural and lung tumours (but not for peritoneal tumours,
Based on these considerations, and a discussion of the associated uncertain
ties, a series of quantified risk summary statements for different levels o
f cumulative exposure are presented. Crown Copyright (C) 2000 Published by
Elsevier Science Ltd on behalf of British Occupational Hygiene Society. All
rights reserved.