Njo. Birkmeyer et al., Prosthetic valve type for patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: A decision analysis, ANN THORAC, 70(6), 2000, pp. 1946-1952
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Background. In two large, randomized, clinical trials long-term survival af
ter aortic valve replacement (AVR) was similar for patients receiving tissu
e and mechanical aortic heart valve prostheses. Higher bleeding rates among
patients with mechanical valves, who must receive permanent oral anticoagu
lation to prevent thromboembolism, were offset by higher reoperation rates
for valve degeneration among patients with tissue valves. Because the avera
ge age of patients undergoing AVR and clinical practices have changed consi
derably since the randomized clinical trials were conducted, we performed a
decision analysis to reassess the optimal valve type for patients undergoi
ng AVR.
Methods. We used a Markov state-transition model to simulate the occurrence
of valve-related events and life expectancy for patients undergoing AVR. p
robabilities of clinical events and mortality were derived from the randomi
zed clinical trials and large follow-up studies.
Results. Although the two valve types were associated with similar life exp
ectancy in 60-year-old patients (mean age of patients; in the randomized cl
inical trials), tissue valves were associated with greater life expectancy
than mechanical valves (10.7 versus 11.1 years) in 70-year-old patients (cu
rrently mean age of AVR patients). For 70-year-old patients, the effects of
major bleeding complications (24%) with mechanical valves substantially ou
tweighed those of reoperation for valve failure (12%) with tissue valves at
12 years. Of the clinical practice changes assessed, the recommended valve
type was most sensitive to changes in bleeding rates with anticoagulation.
However, bleeding rates would have to be 68% lower than those reported in
the European randomized clinical trial to affect the recommended valve type
for 70-year-old patients. Reoperation rates would have to be five times hi
gher, and mortality rates at reoperation would have to be four times higher
to affect the recommended valve type for 70-year-old patients.
Conclusions. Although mechanical valves are preferred for AVR patients less
than 60 years old, most patients currently undergoing AVR are elderly and
would benefit more from tissue valves. (Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:1946-52) (C
) 2000 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.