Antenatal transfer of rural women to perinatal centres

Citation
Cl. Roberts et al., Antenatal transfer of rural women to perinatal centres, AUST NZ J O, 40(4), 2000, pp. 377-384
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine
Journal title
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY
ISSN journal
00048666 → ACNP
Volume
40
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
377 - 384
Database
ISI
SICI code
0004-8666(200011)40:4<377:ATORWT>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
The aim of this study was to describe antenatal transfers of rural women to perinatal centres, and among transferred women, to assess the use of selec ted evidence-based therapies and determine the predictors of preterm and im minent births. The clinical records of rural women antenatally transferred to perinatal centres in NSW and the ACT during 1997-1998 were reviewed. Of 453 rural antenatal transfers, 408 (90%) were emergency transfers. Increasi ng remoteness was associated with increased rates of antenatal transfer but not with a lower probability of giving birth. Of all transferred women, 64 % delivered; 58% of preterm transfersdelivered preterm and of those deliver ing preterm, 76% delivered within 7 days. Although the main reason for antenatal transfer was the possibility of pret erm birth, women presenting with preterm contractions only were less likely to deliver preterm (OR = 0.2, 95% CI0.1-0.4) or less than or equal to 7 da ys (OR = 0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.5) than women with any other presenting symptoms . The overall usage of effective interventions (antenatal steroids, antibio tics for PPROM and beta -mimetic tocolysis to delay birth) among antenatall y transferred rural women was high, but there is room for increased uptake prior to transfer.