Ra. Parslow et Af. Jorm, Who uses mental health services in Australia? An analysis of data from theNational Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing, AUST NZ J P, 34(6), 2000, pp. 997-1008
Objective: This study sought to identify sociodemographic and psychological
measures associated with utilisation of mental health services in Australi
a, using information collected through the 1997 National Survey of Mental H
ealth and Wellbeing.
Method: Twenty-one potential predictor variables were selected from the Nat
ional Survey. Predisposing and enabling factors included age, sex, marital
status, labour force status, geographical location and level of education.
Predictor variables measuring need for services included the General Health
Questionnaire score, a neuroticism scale, diagnoses of affective, anxiety
and substance-abuse disorders from the Composite International Diagnostic i
nterview, and self-identified depression, anxiety and substance abuse. Simp
le and multiple logistic regressions were undertaken to identify predictor
variables associated with use of mental health services from general practi
tioners, psychiatrists, psychologists and other health professionals.
Results: General practitioners were the most commonly reported providers of
mental health services with 76% of those receiving any mental health care
reporting using this type of service. Using multiple logistic regression, t
he predictor variables most associated with use of mental health services w
ere measures of the need for such services, such as psychological distress
and mental disorder. After controlling for need variables, the sociodemogra
phic variables associated with using services provided by any health profes
sional were being female, level of education and being separated. Living in
a remote area was associated with lower use of specialist services, but no
t with general practitioner services. Older age was associated with less us
e of psychologists and other health professionals. income and having a usua
l language other than English did not affect service use.
Conclusions: The factors most strongly related to Australians' use of menta
l health services are their having a diagnosed affective, anxiety or substa
nce-abuse disorder and their self-identifying as having depression or anxie
ty. Although there are regional inequalities in levels of utilisation of me
ntal health services, these are seen more with specialist services than wit
h those provided by general practitioners.