Production and forage quality of prairie grass (Bromus willdenowii) in comparison to perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) and tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) in subtropical dairy pastures
Wj. Fulkerson et al., Production and forage quality of prairie grass (Bromus willdenowii) in comparison to perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) and tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) in subtropical dairy pastures, AUST J EX A, 40(8), 2000, pp. 1059-1068
A grazing study was conducted, over a 3-year period (1997-99), on the subtr
opical north coast of New South Wales, Australia, to compare the yield of p
rairie grass (Bromus willdenowii cv. Matua), tall fescue (Festuca arundinac
ea cv. Vulcan) and perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne cv. Yatsyn), on a wel
l-drained red krasnozem soil at Wollongbar Agricultural Research Institute
(WAI) and on a heavy clay soil at Casino. The effect of grazing interval (e
quivalent to the time taken to regrow 1.5, 2.5 or 4 leaves/tiller) in sprin
g, and forage quality of prairie grass in winter and spring was also assess
ed.
At both sites, the dry matter (DM) yields of prairie grass over the establi
shment year and in year 2 were significantly (P<0.001) higher than for the
other 2 grass species (mean for 2 years over the 2 sites was 23.8, 8.9 and
7.7 t DM/ha for prairie grass, ryegrass and tall fescue, respectively). In
year 3, there was no production of tall fescue or ryegrass at the WAI site
while prairie grass produced 11.3 t DM/ha although this was obtained from n
atural seedling recruitment after the sward was sprayed with a herbicide in
February of that year. At the Casino site, ryegrass and tall fescue still
made substantial growth in year 3 (3.1 and 2.1 t DM/ha for ryegrass and tal
l fescue, respectively) but this was significantly below the yields of prai
rie grass (5.5 t DM/ha). More frequent grazing of prairie grass in spring (
equivalent to 1.5 leaves/tiller of regrowth) led to significantly (P<0.05)
less plants surviving summer and less seedling recruitment in the following
autumn. The annual yield of the 1.5 leaf treatment was significantly (P<0.
05) lower than the remaining treatments but only in the third year of the s
tudy. Analysis of prairie grass forage samples, taken in June (vegetative s
ward) and November (reproductive sward), gave magnesium values of less than
0.2% DM which is below the concentration found in ryegrass and that recomm
ended for dairy cattle. The Ca : P and K : (Ca + Mg) ratios in prairie gras
s improved, as a forage for dairy cows, with regrowth time up to 5 leaves/t
iller. Metabolisable energy remained constant with regrowth time in June at
10.8 MJ/kg DM but fell significantly in November from 10.7 MJ/kg DM, immed
iately post-grazing, to 9.2 MJ/kg DM at the 4.5 leaves/tiller stage of regr
owth.
In contrast to observations in ryegrass, the water-soluble carbohydrate con
tent of forage samples of prairie grass taken in November showed a substant
ial increase with regrowth time to over 12% DM at the 3 leaves/tiller stage
of regrowth.
The high productivity and forage quality of prairie grass obtained over a 3
-year period suggests this grass species could be a suitable temperate pere
nnial grass for subtropical dairy pastures. An appropriately long grazing i
nterval in spring seems critical to optimise plant survival over summer and
for adequate seed set for seedling recruitment the following autumn. If su
mmer weeds and/or grasses invade to a significant extent, the large seedban
k of prairie grass provides the opportunity to spray out the pasture in sum
mer and rely on seedling recruitment to establish a new sward in autumn. Th
e forage quality of prairie grass in winter and spring is similar to perenn
ial ryegrass but the magnesium levels are substantially lower and stock gra
zing this type of pasture for extended periods would need to be supplemente
d with this mineral.