The aim of the paper is to explore whether the division of borderline perso
nality disorder, as described in the DSM classification, into impulsive and
borderline subtypes of emotionally unstable personality disorder in the IC
D classification of personality disorder, is a valid division. The self-rep
ort questionnaire responses of 288 referrals to a personality disorder serv
ice were rated on each of the eight criteria for DSM-III-R diagnosis of bor
derline personality disorder. Factor analysis identified two factors; facto
r one closely corresponds with the borderline subtype of ICD10, whilst fact
or two closely corresponds with the impulsive subtype of ICD10. Criteria co
mmon to both factors unstable relationships and identity confusion - were c
onsidered core features of borderline personality disorder. The pattern of
occurrence of the two factors was similar to the complex binary picture des
cribed by ICD10. However there were also differences. Firstly, identity con
fusion is found to be a core feature of both our factors, and this does not
conform to the restriction of identity confusion to the borderline subtype
s in ICD10. Secondly, we found a residual Cool of undifferentiated borderli
ne patients and a small group of pure non-impulsive borderline patients who
are nor: currently accommodated within the ICD10 emotionally unstable pers
onality disorder. We conclude that future classifications of this disorder
should accommodate four subtypes, and suggest these subtypes have implicati
ons for treatment and further research.