Yk. Suh et Hjc. Shin, Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of granulocytic sarcoma - A clinicopathologic study of 27 cases, CANC CYTOP, 90(6), 2000, pp. 364-372
BACKGROUND. Because of morphologic similarities, the differential diagnosis
of granulocytic sarcoma (GS) in fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens inc
ludes non-Hodgkin or Hodgkin lymphoma, extramedullary hematopoiesis, poorly
differentiated carcinoma, and infection.
METHODS. Twenty-six FNAs and 1 pleural effusion fluid specimen of GS obtain
ed from 23 patients were reviewed for cytomorphologic features and clinical
characteristics. The cases were categorized as blastic, immature, or matur
e GS based on the population of the cells present on the smears.
RESULTS. The patients included 18 men and 5 women (mean age, 54 years). Asp
iration sites included subcutaneous or soft tissue (15 cases), lymph nodes
(5 cases), bones (3 cases), testis (1 case), ileum (1 case), and liver (1 c
ase). One sample of pleural effusion fluid also was included. Review of the
patients' clinical history revealed that GS was secondary to chronic myelo
genous leukemia (CML) in 17 patients, was secondary to chronic myelomonocyt
ic leukemia (CMML) in 2 patients, and was secondary to acute myelogenous le
ukemia in 2 patients. GS preceded the manifestation of CML in one patient a
nd of CMML in another patient. Based on the proportions of cells, morpholog
ic classification was attempted and revealed blastic GS in 8 aspirates and
1 pleural effusion fluid specimen, immature GS in 13 aspirates, and mature
GS in 5 aspirates. Twelve of 22 specimens from extranodal sites (55%) demon
strated lymphoglandular bodies In the background. Five aspirates showed rar
e eosinophilic myelocytes. Auer rods were not identified in any of the aspi
rates. Immunophenotypic and histochemical studies confirmed myeloid and/or
myelomonocytic differentiation.
CONCLUSIONS. GS especially can be confused with non-Hodgkin lymphoma becaus
e of morphologic similarities of the blasts to large cell lymphoma, the pre
sence of lymphoglandular bodies, and the rarity of Auer rods and eosinophil
ic myelocytes. In conjunction with careful cytomorphologic evaluation, know
ledge of die patient's clinical history and use of appropriate immunophenot
ypic studies should lead to a correct diagnosis. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol)
2000;90:364-372. (C) 2000 American Cancer Society.