The Octopus Study: Rationale and design of two randomized trials on medical effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of bypass surgery on the beating heart
D. Van Dijk et al., The Octopus Study: Rationale and design of two randomized trials on medical effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of bypass surgery on the beating heart, CONTR CL TR, 21(6), 2000, pp. 595-609
The Octopus Study consists of two multicenter randomized clinical trials in
which coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart (off-pump CABG)
using the Utrecht Octopus Method is compared to intracoronary stent implan
tation and conventional CABG. The primary endpoint in the comparison of off
-pump CABG versus stent implantation (OctoStent Trial) is medical effective
ness (i.e., absence of reintervention and major adverse cardiac and cerebro
vascular events atl year after treatment). The primary endpoint in the comp
arison of off-pump CABG versus conventional CABG (OctoPump Trial) is cerebr
al safety (i.e., absence of cognitive deficits and cerebrovascular events a
t 3 months after treatment). Secondary endpoints in both trials include pre
sence and severity of angina, quality of life, exercise capacity, and cost-
effectiveness. A total of 560 Patients will be enrolled. A random sample of
210 patients will undergo repeat angiography at 1 year to assess angiograp
hic restenosis rate and graft patency. Including 1-year follow-up, the stud
y will last for 3 years. (C) Elsevier Science Inc. 2000.