BACKGROUND. Despite more than a century of reporting in the medical literat
ure, controversy still surrounds both the efficacy and longevity of autolog
ous fat transplantation in subcutaneous soft tissue augmentation.
OBJECTIVE. To summarize the existing literature relating to the effectivene
ss of this procedure and to highlight differences in technique that may pla
y a role in reported treatment successes and failures.
METHODS. Review of the literature and reporting of authors' observations an
d results.
CONCLUSION. Autologous fat transplantation can be a gratifyingly effective
treatment for subcutaneous augmentation that may produce permanent results
in some cases. This article aims to clarify some of the differences in tech
nique employed by doctors in this field and aims to enable the reader to be
tter see the subtle, but sometimes important differences in methods used.