PRIORITIES IN OCCUPATIONAL-HEALTH RESEARCH - A DELPHI STUDY IN THE NETHERLANDS

Citation
Aj. Vanderbeek et al., PRIORITIES IN OCCUPATIONAL-HEALTH RESEARCH - A DELPHI STUDY IN THE NETHERLANDS, Occupational and environmental medicine, 54(7), 1997, pp. 504-510
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
ISSN journal
13510711
Volume
54
Issue
7
Year of publication
1997
Pages
504 - 510
Database
ISI
SICI code
1351-0711(1997)54:7<504:PIOR-A>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Objectives-To achieve a coherent programme of topics for research in o ccupational health and safety, with well founded priorities and to rel ate them to perceived gaps and needs in The Netherlands. Methods-In th e first phase of the study 33 key informants were interviewed. In the second phase questionnaires were sent to 150 Dutch experts (including the key informants). Four groups were recruited, originating from: occ upational health and safety services; scientific research institutes; governmental and other administrative bodies; and companies. Using the Delphi technique, the experts were asked to prioritise several topics , which were placed under different headings. In the third phase five workshops were organised to elaborate on the highly prioritised topics . Results-The response rates were 86% for the first and 81% for the se cond questionnaire. In the second round consistency was reached and co nsensus proved to be satisfactory, so that the Delphi process was stop ped. There were surprisingly few differences in opinion between the fo ur groups. The most important heading was ''design/implementation/eval uation of measures'', in which the topic cost-benefit analysis of meas ures had the highest score. ''Assessment of relations between exposure and effect'' was the second most important heading. Under this headin g, topics on work stress were generally judged to be more important th an topics on musculoskeletal disorders, which in turn had higher score s than topics on safety and biological, chemical, and physical hazards . The headings ''occupational rehabilitation/sociomedical guidance'' a nd ''occupational health occupational health services'' had about the same priority, closely following the heading ''assessment of relations between exposure and effect''. Conclusions-The general agreement on p riorities should provide a sufficiently broad basis for decision maker s to initiate a long term programme for occupational health research a nd development in The Netherlands.