Two previously proposed training sequence optimization techniques for chann
el estimation are compared. One method is based on a frequency-domain (FD)
based channel estimation method and the other is based on a time-domain (TD
) channel estimation technique. The FD method produces a lower complexity s
earch strategy, hut does not always result in the optimal training sequence
s in terms of the mean-squared channel estimation error. A proof of the sup
eriority of the TD method over the FD method is presented in this letter. B
ased on the proof, an alternative search criterion is proposed, which, in g
eneral, provides equivalent or better performance than the FD method while
still enjoying the low search complexity.