OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors associated with an unexpected outbreak
of pyrogenic reactions (PR) following intravenous gentamicin.
DESIGN: We conducted two cohort studies. PRs were defined as chills, rigors
, or shaking within 3 hours after initiating the gentamicin infusion during
the preepidemic (December 1, 1997-January 15, 1998) or epidemic (May 1-Jun
e 15, 1998) periods. We tested gentamicin vials for endotoxin using the lim
ulus amebocyte lysate assay.
SETTING: Inpatient services of a large community hospital in Los Angeles, C
alifornia.
RESULTS: During the epidemic period, 22 (15%) of 152 patients developed doc
umented PRs following intravenous gen tamicin. PRs were more likely among p
atients receiving single daily dosing (SDD) than multiple daily dosing gent
amicin (20/73 [27%] vs 2/79 [3%]; relative risk, 10.8; 95% confidence inter
val, 2.6-44.7). Laboratory analysis of gentamicin vials found endotoxin lev
els that were higher among Fujisawa-brand gentamicin (implicated brand) tha
n gentamicin used after the outbreak terminated (non-implicated brand). Alt
hough endotoxin levels in the vials did not exceed US Pharmacopeia limits (
1.7 endotoxin units/mg gentamicin), the use of SDD gentamicin may place pat
ients at greater risk of receiving doses of endotoxin above the threshold f
or PRs in humans..
CONCLUSIONS: Reassessment of the acceptable amounts of endotoxin in gentami
cin and other parenteral products should be considered when dosing interval
s used in clinical practice change.