Different dosages of dobutamine in septic shock patients: determining oxygen consumption with a metabolic monitor integrated in a ventilator

Citation
W. Schaffartzik et al., Different dosages of dobutamine in septic shock patients: determining oxygen consumption with a metabolic monitor integrated in a ventilator, INTEN CAR M, 26(12), 2000, pp. 1740-1746
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
ISSN journal
03424642 → ACNP
Volume
26
Issue
12
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1740 - 1746
Database
ISI
SICI code
0342-4642(200012)26:12<1740:DDODIS>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Objective: Oxygen consumption (VO2) obtained from respiratory gases by indi rect calorimetry (VO2,IC) with a metabolic monitor integrated in a ventilat or were to be compared to VO2 obtained by the Fick principle (VO2,Fick) in septic patients following an increase in oxygen delivery (DO2) induced by p ositive inotropic support. Design: Prospective clinical study. Setting: University Hospital, Surgical Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Patients: Thirty patients suffering from sepsis. Interventions: DO2 was increased by dobutamine infusion, starting with an i nitial dosage of 5 mug.kg.min, increased to a maximum of 10 mug.kg.min. Measurements and main results: Dobutamine infusion induced a dosage-related increase in DO2 (from 577 +/- 192 to 752 +/- 202 ml.min.m(2), p < 0.01), w hich was associated with a statistically significant increase in VO2, IC (f rom 173 +/- 30 to 188 +/- 28 ml.min.m(2), 140 +/- 25 to 156 +/- 24 ml.min.m (2), p < 0.01). The comparison between VO2,IC and VO2,Fick revealed differe nces (bias and precision - 33 +/- 32 ml min m(2)). Conclusions: With a metabolic monitor integrated in a ventilator it was pos sible to carry out continuous monitoring of calorimetric data under clinica l conditions. In contrast to previous studies using indirect calorimetry, t his study showed a moderate correlation between VO2 and DO2 in septic patie nts using either method. The clinical relevance of this finding requires fu rther investigation. Different factors (e.g. injectant temperature, pulmona ry VO2) produced substantial differences between VO2,IC and VO2,Fick as pre viously shown.